Fears of another major earthquake have been rekindled in İstanbul since the Feb. 6 disaster that hit Turkey and Syria, but a prominent Turkish seismologist has reassured the risk “hasn’t increased,” according to Agence France-Presse.
“The risk hasn’t increased because we are talking about completely different systems,” Doğan Kalafat, director of the Kandilli Observatory’s Earthquake-Tsunami Monitoring Center in İstanbul, told AFP.
Turkey’s most populated city is situated near the North Anatolian Fault, while the recent 7.8-magnitude quake that killed 43,500 people occurred along another fault in the country’s southeast, Kalafat explained.
Still, the 16 million residents of İstanbul, a city that spreads over two continents and has seen skyscrapers mushroom in recent years, are wondering if they’re ready for the “Big One.”
“I’d like to say so, but sadly, it’s a very big city with too many poorly constructed buildings,” said Kalafat, who has denounced using low-quality cement and building on “soft soil.”
While waiting for a large-scale quake, “we must make good use of time. We must build earthquake-proof houses on solid soil. It’s the most important precaution to take,” the seismologist stressed.
At the observatory, seismologists take turns every eight hours watching a series of computer screens monitoring potential tremors.
In front of them, on a wall, at least five meters (16 feet) tall, a giant screen provides real-time readings from 260 seismic stations across the country.
“Nine thousand aftershocks have taken place in Turkey since February 6,” which is more than “seven or eight times normal,” Kalafat said.
On one of the desks, a laminated map shows the North Anatolian Fault, which crosses the Sea of Marmara, only “15 to 17 kilometers” from the southern shores of Istanbul, Kalafat said.
In 2001, two years after a 7.4-magnitude earthquake left 17,000 people dead in northwest Turkey, Kalafat calculated a 65 percent probability that a quake with a magnitude above 7 would occur before 2030 in the same region — which includes Istanbul.
The risk climbs to 75 percent in 50 years and 95 percent in 90 years.
“These statistics are still relevant,” said Kalafat. “Even with the technology of today, it is impossible to predict an earthquake.”
“We can indicate, with a certain margin of error, where an earthquake can occur and what magnitude it can be, but we can’t know when it will occur,” he said.
The Kandilli Observatory has developed an early warning system “but Istanbul is too close to the fault line” for a system to be effective, Kalafat said.
On one of the desks, sitting between two screens, is a black telephone with two red labels with the public disaster management agency’s acronym, allowing scientists to send an alert for a major earthquake.
The early warning could win “a maximum of seven or eight seconds” — not enough time to allow inhabitants to get to safety.
In comparison, the telephonic warning system in Japan’s Tohoku region, which was struck by a devastating earthquake and tsunami in March 2011, buys the public 45 seconds.
“There, you can send a message warning citizens, but we don’t have this possibility here,” he said.